Flashpoints and Fault Lines: How Christian Nationalism Is Reshaping State Education Laws
Resist & Rise Christian Nationalism Series—Week 8
State legislatures are rapidly advancing efforts to incorporate Christian nationalist ideology into public schools, reproductive rights, immigration policies, and civil liberties. This move is testing the boundaries of democracy, pluralism, and the Constitution.
The Theocratic Surge: Why This Week’s Battles Matter
In 2025, the United States is witnessing a coordinated effort to transform state laws into instruments for advancing Christian nationalist agendas. From Oklahoma’s now-repealed mandate to incorporate the Bible into classrooms to a surge in anti-LGBTQ+ and abortion restrictions, statehouses have become battlegrounds for the very essence of American democracy. These aren’t isolated conflicts; they are pivotal moments in a national initiative to redefine citizenship, education, and rights along exclusionary religious lines. The outcome of these battles will determine whether pluralism or theocracy will dominate public life.
Part 7 in the Christian Nationalism Series:
Part 1 in the Christian Nationalism Series:
Consider buying me a cup of coffee if you find value in series like these.
Schoolhouse Theocracy: Bibles, Censorship, and Forced Outing
In 2024, Oklahoma mandated that teachers keep Christian Bibles in every classroom and incorporate them into lessons. However, this policy was rescinded in 2025 after facing legal challenges and public backlash, highlighting the constitutional risks associated with state-mandated religion. (https://www.pjstar.com/story/news/2025/10/31/oklahoma-abandons-bible-classroom-requirement/86982456007/)
Furthermore, thirteen states now restrict LGBTQ+ topics in schools. Since 2022, nine states have passed “Don’t Say LGBTQ+” laws, which censor classroom discussions and educational materials. (https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/05/28/human-rights-violations-against-lgbtq-communities-united-states) Notably, LGBTQ+ topic books accounted for 39% of the banned books in the 2023–2024 school year, reflecting a deliberate effort to erase diverse identities from education. (https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/05/28/human-rights-violations-against-lgbtq-communities-united-states)
Additionally, seven states require school staff to out transgender students to their families. Texas and Florida further prohibit employees from assisting students with social transition, even with parental consent. (https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/05/28/human-rights-violations-against-lgbtq-communities-united-states)
Kelley Robinson, President of the Human Rights Campaign, emphasized that “bills that aim to write hate into state law, through censoring or banning LGBTQ+ topics and books in the classroom, only help to affirm bullying, hate, and discrimination.” (Washington Post, 2024-03-12) (https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/roundup-of-anti-lgbtq-legislation-advancing-in-states-across-the-country)
Analysis:
Oklahoma’s swift reversal demonstrates that aggressive Christian nationalist overreach can be curbed through legal and civic resistance. However, the sheer volume and coordinated nature of anti-LGBTQ+ and religious mandates suggest a deliberate strategy to overpower opposition and establish theocratic governance.
Bodies and Borders: Reproductive and Immigration Control
Twelve states enforce total abortion bans, and 29 others ban abortion at various gestational points, as of July 7th, 2025. (https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/state-policies-abortion-bans) 154,900 people crossed state lines for abortion in 2024—15% of all abortions in states without total bans (https://www.guttmacher.org/2024/12/state-policy-trends-2024-anti-abortion-policymakers-redouble-attacks-on-bodily-autonomy). The Department of Homeland Security ended its policy of treating churches as “protected areas” for immigration enforcement, prompting lawsuits from religious groups who argue that sanctuary is a core faith practice. The state is attempting to shut down Annunciation House, a Catholic organization sheltering migrants, arguing that religious beliefs cannot defend “harboring unauthorized immigrants.” The organization is countersuing under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
“The call to solidarity is also a call to promote the effective recognition of the rights of immigrants and to overcome all discrimination based on race, culture, or religion. . .. Catholic lay people, diocesan officials, and bishops should continue to work together with community organizations, labor unions, and other religious bodies on behalf of the rights of immigrants in the workplace, schools, public services, our legal system, and all levels of government.” Welcoming the Stranger Among Us: Unity in Diversity, A Statement of the U.S. Catholic Bishops ( https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/migrants-refugees-and-travelers/quotes-rights-migrants-refugees )
Analysis:
Christian nationalist actors exploit religious liberty as a pretext for exclusionary policies, yet they refuse to extend the same protections to faith-based immigrant advocates. This stark contrast highlights a blatant double standard in the interpretation and application of “religious freedom.”
Courts as Battlegrounds: The Legal Infrastructure of Theocracy
National groups like Alliance Defending Freedom and the Heritage Foundation draft model bills and defend them in court, creating a pipeline from statehouse to Supreme Court (https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/right-wing-labs-how-state-legislatures-are-driving-anti-lgbtq-attacks-at-federal-level). For instance, in 2025, a Montana court blocked a broad anti-trans bathroom ban, while the 4th Circuit blocked West Virginia’s ban on transgender girls in school sports. These cases highlight the ongoing efforts to challenge anti-LGBTQ policies at the federal level (https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/joint-statement-on-preliminary-injunction-ruling-in-case-challenging-anti-transgender-bathroom-ban), (https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/active-court-cases-that-will-influence-the-state-of-lgbtq-rights). The Court will soon rule on transgender sports bans and the limits of federal judicial oversight in immigration, with nationwide implications (https://www.aclu.org/news/lgbtq-rights/state-legislative-round-youth-schools-and-transgender). Oklahoma’s Bible mandate was rescinded after legal action, demonstrating that Establishment Clause violations remain vulnerable, even in conservative states (https://www.pjstar.com/story/news/2025/10/31/oklahoma-abandons-bible-classroom-requirement/86982456007/). Judge Jason Marks, Missoula County District Court, emphasized the need for extraordinary protection for transgender Montanans due to their history of unequal treatment and political powerlessness (https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/joint-statement-on-preliminary-injunction-ruling-in-case-challenging-anti-transgender-bathroom-ban).
Analysis:
The legal landscape is volatile: some courts defend civil rights, others enable discrimination. The Supreme Court’s next moves will determine whether constitutional protections or Christian nationalist legal theories prevail.
The Coordinated Campaign: Model Bills, Money, and Messaging
The Human Rights Campaign has documented how “right-wing labs” like the Heritage Foundation develop template bills that appear in multiple state legislatures, creating the illusion of grassroots movements (https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/right-wing-labs-how-state-legislatures-are-driving-anti-lgbtq-attacks-at-federal-level). This policy manifesto calls for federal action to ban medication abortion, restrict reproductive health language, and rebrand the Department of Health and Human Services as the “Department of Life” (https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/how-project-2025-seeks-obliterate-srhr). Fifteen states now define sex strictly by reproductive anatomy, chromosomes, or hormones, using nearly identical language to exclude transgender and intersex people from legal protections (https://19thnews.org/2025/05/anti-trans-extreme-state-laws-2025/). LGBTQ+ youth crisis hotlines report surges in calls citing anti-LGBTQ+ political rhetoric as a top reason for distress (https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/roundup-of-anti-lgbtq-legislation-advancing-in-states-across-the-country). “The end goal of anti-trans legislation is denying transgender people the words to describe our experience, the means to express it safely, and the community and support we all deserve,” said Chase Strangio, Deputy Director for Transgender Justice, ACLU (ACLU, 2025-09-19) (https://www.aclu.org/legislative-attacks-on-lgbtq-rights-2025).
Analysis:
This isn’t a grassroots backlash; it’s a top-down, well-funded campaign aimed at imposing a narrow interpretation of gender, sexuality, and religion on public life. Consequently, we end up with a patchwork of rights and protections that vary depending on your zip code.
What It Means
The Christian nationalist capture of state policy poses an existential threat to American pluralism and democracy. By embedding religious doctrine into various aspects of law, such as school curricula, reproductive healthcare, and civil rights, these movements are establishing a two-tier system of citizenship based on theological conformity. While legal challenges and reversals demonstrate that constitutional protections still hold some sway, the sheer volume and coordination of these attacks suggest a long-term strategy aimed at exhausting opposition and normalizing theocratic governance. The most vulnerable groups, including LGBTQ+ youth, pregnant individuals, immigrants, and religious minorities, are disproportionately affected, even as these policies are justified under the guise of “religious freedom.”
What’s Next
Supreme Court Transgender Sports Cases: Decisions expected in 2025 will set nationwide precedents for transgender students’ participation in school activities (https://www.aclu.org/news/lgbtq-rights/state-legislative-round-youth-schools-and-transgender).
Legislative Sessions in Texas, Florida, and Iowa: Watch for new bills targeting LGBTQ+ rights, reproductive access, and immigrant protections in upcoming sessions (https://19thnews.org/2025/05/anti-trans-extreme-state-laws-2025/).
2026 Ballot Initiative Campaigns: Both sides are preparing for expanded ballot campaigns, with Christian nationalist groups developing new strategies to counter pro-choice and pro-LGBTQ+ measures (https://www.guttmacher.org/2024/11/abortion-rights-state-ballot-measures-2024).
Call to Action
Track and Oppose Legislation: Use the ACLU’s real-time tracker to monitor anti-LGBTQ+ bills in your state and sign petitions opposing discriminatory laws (ACLU Legislative Tracker).
Support Legal Challenges: Donate to organizations like Lambda Legal, the ACLU, and state-based civil rights groups fighting these laws.
Reader Question: How are Christian nationalist policies impacting your community’s schools, healthcare access, or local government? Share your observations and experiences for our ongoing investigation into democracy.
Methods & Verification
All factual claims were cross-checked against primary legislative tracking databases, recent court records, and reporting from the ACLU, Human Rights Campaign, Guttmacher Institute, and major news outlets. Quotes and data were independently confirmed via official government documents, legal filings, and organizational records from 2024–2025.